An expert may see AI as a faster way to find the right documents. Opposing counsel may see the prompts as a map of how the expert built the universe of evidence. That tension is at the center of Conservation L. Found., Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.
Continue Reading The New Litigation Metadata: Experts’ AI Prompts May Not Stay Behind the Scenes
On March 30, 2026, the Seventh Circuit addressed sanctions for an attorney citing AI-generated hallucinations and clarified the responsibilities of opposing counsel when receiving such a pleading.
Morgan v. V2X explored court‑crafted limits on using AI with confidential discovery and what AI‑specific protective orders may mean for litigants.
In Morgan v. V2X, Inc., a Colorado district court examined how AI use in litigation affects work product protection and the handling of confidential information.
As generative AI enters disclosure practice in England and Wales, courts and practitioners face emerging questions about transparency, proportionality, and human oversight.
Continue Reading Disclosure in England and Wales: Where to Next on the AI Journey?
Courts in England and Wales are confronting the risks of AI-assisted document preparation, with recent decisions highlighting the potential risk of fabricated case citations in common law jurisdictions where precedent is paramount.
In February, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York issued case-ending sanctions against an attorney who failed to “learn from his mistakes” and repeatedly submitted filings containing false, AI-generated citations to the court.
Continue Reading Court Sanctions Highlight Potential Risks of Using Unchecked AI in Litigation
Greenberg Traurig Shareholders Jacqueline Tambone deGrandpre and Elizabeth E. Georgiopoulos, along with Law Clerk/JD Luis Carlos Balaguer Escobar will present the Boston Bar Association webinar, “eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence: 2025 Year in Review and 2026 Trends.” DeGrandpre will moderate the program, with Georgiopoulos and Balaguer Escobar serving as panelists.
This timely program will explore
During the Generative AI and Litigation CLE Panel at the New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting, the panelists discussed whether AI “prompts” that are typically used to create output from generative AI are discoverable and whether all such prompts can be deemed privileged. The audience seemed surprised to learn that the short answers are
Late last year, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. The changes to Rules 26 and 16 focus on streamlining discovery, particularly regarding privilege and work product, by mandating that parties address these issues at the initial Rule 26(f) conference.