In February, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York issued case-ending sanctions against an attorney who failed to “learn from his mistakes” and repeatedly submitted filings containing false, AI-generated citations to the court.
Continue Reading Court Sanctions Highlight Potential Risks of Using Unchecked AI in Litigation
Greenberg Traurig Shareholders Jacqueline Tambone deGrandpre and Elizabeth E. Georgiopoulos, along with Law Clerk/JD Luis Carlos Balaguer Escobar will present the Boston Bar Association webinar, “eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence: 2025 Year in Review and 2026 Trends.” DeGrandpre will moderate the program, with Georgiopoulos and Balaguer Escobar serving as panelists.
This timely program will explore
During the Generative AI and Litigation CLE Panel at the New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting, the panelists discussed whether AI “prompts” that are typically used to create output from generative AI are discoverable and whether all such prompts can be deemed privileged. The audience seemed surprised to learn that the short answers are
Judges are still figuring out the best way to preempt misuse of generative AI (GenAI) in their courts as use of AI technology becomes more commonplace in litigation.
Since Judge Brantley Starr of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the first standing order on the use of AI in preparing
GT eDiscovery & eRetention Practice Shareholder Jacqueline Tambone deGrandpre and Of Counsel Kelly M. Pesce will participate in the “2024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence” event hosted by the Boston Bar Association Dec. 11 from noon to 1 p.m.
Panelists will discuss recent developments in eDiscovery and artificial intelligence over the past
Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Assocs., Ltd. involves allegations that defendant Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd. d/b/a MSA Security, Inc. (MSA) violated a federal whistleblower law. The parties have engaged in lengthy and contentious discovery and most recently argued before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia about plaintiff’s objection to the Magistrate Judge granting MSA’s